The following is a brief summary of the application, and some notes to guide any objectors to the principles in which the local authority will consider any letters.
An application has been made to Rutland County Council (RCC) by ‘Mrs Florence Biddle and others’ to site a residential caravan park in a field off the A47 between Wardley and Allexton. The initial plan is for:
“Change of use of land to use as a residential caravan site for 16 gypsy families, each with two caravans, laying of hard standings, construction of access road and formation of new access.”
The plans also show an additional 16 ablution blocks on the site but these are not part of the current application.
Full details of the application can be viewed on-line at Rutland County Council quoting application number FUL/2009/0533
Rutland County Council still recommend that all letters of objection be with them as soon as possible. They do not recommend the use of ‘pro-forma’ style letters (when residents use the same letter provided by a working group, just adding their personal details and signing); they would prefer to receive individual letters as this makes a stronger case. It was recommended that we provide guidelines to help residents put their letters together so I have detailed below the main objections. It is hoped that residents will select a handful of these objections that are of particular importance to them, rather than list all in one long letter. Alan Duncan would like to see copies of as many letters as possible, so please forward a copy to the address at the end of this note.
Sustainability – RCC prefer not to site new developments in areas where the new occupants cannot easily access their local amenities without using their cars:
· no footpaths/cycle lanes between the applicant’s field and Uppingham town
· no PO or village shop in Belton (contrary to their application)
· small farm shop at Belton in Rutland: limited stock, infrequent seasonal opening times - will involve crossing A47 to access
· nearest village shop Medbourne several miles away
· limited bus route to Uppingham. Route 747 (link between Uppingham and Leicester) recently under threat of closure
· impact on Uppingham town and schools. How will the children get to school? How will they cross the A47 when the school bus drops them off?
· poor infrastructure in Uppingham town for bored teenagers and few jobs available for them
· Belton pre-school playgroup full to capacity and currently turning children away
· difficult dangerous access for emergency services
· no mains water currently available at Wardley village
Highways – obviously a huge issue and one to be address to Rob Baxter at Rutland CC:
· the A47 is not a trunk road - decision will be made locally at RCC
· road very fast – national speed limit 60mph
· local accident black spot, entrance opposite lay-by, close to bell mouth of dual carriageway/crawler lane
· last fatal accident 18 months ago
· history of fog in winter at bottom of hill – reduced visibility/dangerous for vehicles pulling away from site
· RCC will need to implement/fund huge changes to road layout to allow slow moving towing vehicles to exit the site in either direction
· No footpaths/cycle lanes
· Risk of children/animals/footballs straying onto the verges causing accidents
· HGV vehicles using lay-by opposite – risk to pedestrians due to reduced visibility from cab
· café in lay-by would attract residents over the A47
· exit/entrance would need to be illuminated at night causing massive light pollution
· Wardley have been campaigning for a slip road into their village for years due to the dangerous road access – not allowed
Environment and ecology –
· Belton in Rutland a conservation village
· inappropriate development for ‘areas of particularly attractive countryside’ (as stated in EN28 of Rutland Local Plan)
· size of initial community would be larger than Wardley and nearly same size as Allexton
· light pollution from the exit/entrance lighting - bats/owls in surrounding woods
· visual impact – unsightly from A47 approaching Uppingham and from local villages
· unsuitable development for an area known to be at risk of flooding –
1. photographs available showing Sweethedges Farm and Allexton village flooded
2. water level rises dramatically in heavy rain/after heavy snow
3. proposed sewage system unsuitable for areas at flood risk, risking raw sewage seeping in the Eye Brook and Allexton village.
· Wardley village pipe their drinking water from a bore hole nearby applicant’s field
· Eyebrook Reservoir SSSi nature reserve - huge abundance of protected wildlife in the reservoir and Eye Brook area namely: otters, osprey, king fishers, terrapins, crayfish, bats, grass snakes, great crested newts, water voles and well as unusual flora and fauna. A survey by an ecologist is essential to provide evidence of this.
· applicant’s field not grazed or ploughed for sometime so likely to be a haven to wildlife, flora and fauna.
· there are established hedges and trees (contrary to application) - surveys necessary
· organic farm in Stockerston village - animals drinking from the brook
· the Eye Brook runs alongside applicant’s field - risk of pollution downstream from:
1. contaminated surface and foul water running into brook
2. raw sewage waste polluting brook if area flooded at high water
3. general dumping in the brook – polluting/blocking stream
4. diesel/waste oil from vehicles – 32 vehicles declared in application – it would be naïve to accept that this would not rise. On checking a google earth image it was discovered that Mrs Biddle currently has nine cars, four lorries, at least one trailer and three caravans on her plot at Justin Park. All in addition to her brick built house.
All letters of objection to be addressed to:
Mr N Hodgett
Planning Officer
Rutland County Council
Catmose
Oakham
Rutland LE15 6HP
Copies to:
Mr Alan Duncan MP
c/o 33 High Street
Melton Mowbray
Leicestershire LE13 0TR
Posted by:
Combined Villages
0
comments
